Should I stream with Windows Media or Shoutcast/MP3?

If you are concerned about accessibility, Shoutcast/MP3 has a slight edge over Windows Media due to all of the major audio players being able to play MP3s. Windows Media is pervasive however, as it comes pre-installed on over 95% of today's new computers.
 
Considering sound quality, Windows Media does have better sound for low-bitrate voice content (24kbps and lower)
 
If you were to stream with Windows Media, we strongly encourage you to use the Pull Broadcasting method, as it is more stable and reliable than the Push method. To broadcast in the Pull method, you'll need to secure a static address (either a static IP address or a dynamic DNS service from no-ip.com) and an open port on your network router. Streaming with Shoutcast doesn't require this extra setup, as its Push method is quite stable.
 
Lastly, Shoutcast has an administration page that lets you view the current number of connected listeners, the peak connected listeners, and a log of stream activity. Streaming with Windows Media does not include these statistics.
  • 1 Users Found This Useful
Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

MP3 Streaming with Icecast/Shoutcast to mobile devices

The MP3 streaming codec is quite flexible when targeted to desktop users, as all of the major...

SHOUTcast DNAS Server Authhash Management

One of the key aspects of the new YP2 directory infrastructure is an authorisation key...

How to Broadcast to SHOUTcast or IceCast from an Mac on OS X

You can use the below software packages to stream on a Mac. MIXXX (Mac OS X) - Download Link...

Ho Do I: SHOUTcast on demand

Before you start uploading your mp3 files, you must follow these steps when encoding your mp3...

How do I stream to mobile devices

  Question; How Do I stream to mobile devices? Answer; You should use a HTML5 embedded...